Australia Senate Committee Backs Digital Assets Licensing Bill — Crypto Platforms Face AFSL Regime
Australia's Senate Economics Legislation Committee endorsed the Digital Assets Framework Bill 2025, requiring crypto platforms to hold financial services licences.
institutional_flow
Australia's Senate Economics Legislation Committee tabled its report on the Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025 on March 16, recommending the Senate pass the Bill without amendment. The legislation would bring cryptocurrency trading platforms and custody providers under Australia's existing financial services framework, requiring operators to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL).
Why it matters: Australia is one of the largest retail crypto markets in Asia-Pacific, and this bill represents the clearest regulatory path the country has seen in years. Clear licensing rules reduce legal uncertainty for exchanges, attract institutional capital, and give retail investors stronger consumer protections.
This is not financial advice. Crypto investments carry substantial risk of loss.
What the Bill Requires
The Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025 amends both the Corporations Act and the ASIC Act to create a licensing regime for "digital token managers" — businesses that operate crypto trading platforms or hold digital assets on behalf of clients.
Key requirements under the proposed framework:
- AFSL licensing: Operators handling client tokens must obtain an Australian Financial Services Licence, the same credential required of stockbrokers and managed fund operators
- Compliance standards: Licensees must meet capital adequacy requirements, maintain proper custody arrangements, and provide dispute resolution mechanisms
- Transition period: A six-month grace period will apply after commencement, giving existing operators time to apply for licences before enforcement begins
- Regulatory oversight: The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) would be the primary regulator
Compliance Costs vs. Institutional Benefits
Regulators acknowledge the framework carries real costs. The preferred regulatory approach is projected to impose approximately $28.4 million in annual compliance costs across the industry. Authorities argue those costs are outweighed by the expected benefits: an estimated $180 million per year in economic gains from attracting institutional capital and supporting the development of up to 1,000 new digital asset startups annually.
International exchanges operating in Australia — including Coinbase, Kraken, and local players like CoinSpot and Swyftx — will need to review their structures and apply for AFSL credentials if the Bill passes into law.
Legislative Status
The Bill has already cleared the House of Representatives. The Senate committee's endorsement sends it to the full Senate floor for debate and a final vote. A date for the Senate vote has not yet been announced, but the committee's unambiguous recommendation — pass without amendment — removes a significant hurdle.
If passed, Australia would join an expanding list of jurisdictions including the European Union (MiCA), Singapore, and the UAE that have enacted comprehensive crypto licensing regimes. It would also set a clear contrast with the United States, where market structure legislation remains pending in Congress.
Industry Reaction
Industry groups in Australia have broadly welcomed the licensing framework as superior to the regulatory vacuum that preceded it, though some smaller operators have raised concerns about AFSL compliance costs squeezing out non-institutional players.
The six-month transition period is seen as a reasonable runway, though exchanges with complex corporate structures may need longer to satisfy ASIC's requirements. ASIC has indicated it expects to issue guidance on licence applications before the legislation takes effect.
Global Regulatory Ripple
Australia's move comes as crypto regulation accelerates globally. The U.S. SEC's proposed "Reg Crypto" safe harbor, the EU's MiCA implementation, and now Australia's AFSL framework are converging toward a world where operating a crypto exchange requires the same regulatory posture as operating any other financial services business.
For projects and exchanges planning international expansion, Australia's regulated market may become increasingly attractive — a large English-speaking market with established financial infrastructure and now, clear rules.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What is the Corporations Amendment (Digital Assets Framework) Bill 2025?
It is an Australian bill that amends the Corporations Act and ASIC Act to require cryptocurrency trading platforms and custody providers to hold an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL), placing them under the same regulatory oversight as traditional financial services businesses.
Q: Has the Bill been passed into law?
Not yet. As of March 23, 2026, the Senate Economics Legislation Committee has recommended passing the Bill without amendment. It must still be debated and voted on by the full Senate.
Q: When would the rules take effect?
The Bill includes a six-month transition period after commencement, giving existing operators time to obtain their AFSL before enforcement begins.
Sources and Attribution
- CoinDesk — Committee endorsement details
- Decrypt — Regulatory push context
- BanklessTimes — Industry impact analysis